Analysis: Biden’s White House lets Trump’s judge set mask policy for travelers
Covid positive. I took a Covid-19 test Tuesday morning after learning of a close contact who had tested positive. I tested positive and so did most of my family. I was probably already positive and contagious while in close quarters on the plane. So I’m glad I was wearing a mask in those final minutes of the rule.
This may be the story of the country right now, as fewer people mask up and Covid-19 infections begin to rise again.
Judges making rules. This is the strange way the US government works, or doesn’t, at the moment.
In the absence of leadership or action from the White House and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle — who used to work in the Trump administration before then-President Donald Trump appointed her to the bench — is making federal policy for the country as the Biden administration sits by. After extending the mask rule last week, the administration did not immediately appeal Mizelle’s ruling this week.
It’s usually conservatives warning about judicial activism, but in this case, the partisan arguments about judges making policy are turned on their heads.
Bottom line: The federal rule for wearing masks on public transportation has not ended because of a long discourse about whether masks work and whether the Covid-19 pandemic has reached the point where they’re no longer necessary to save lives.
Mask detention. What the judge argued is that the CDC’s mask requirement for planes amounted to a form of jail for those who didn’t want to mask up.
“Their freedom of movement is curtailed in a way similar to detention and quarantine,” she wrote.
May be the right thing. What’s most incredible in this backward variation of policymaking is that ending the mask requirement, at least for now, is not concerning some public health experts.
While there is a noticeable uptick in Covid-19 infections in many parts of the country, hospitalizations and deaths have not begun to follow suit, largely due to growing immunity in the population thanks to vaccination and previous infection.
“I’m less worried about what’s happening now,” Dr. Leana Wen, a CNN medical analyst and public health professor at the George Washington University, told CNN’s John King on Tuesday.
She said what’s concerning is if the CDC has now lost the power to require masks. It’s an open question, because Mizelle ruled that the CDC had overstepped its authority in the first place.
“I’m worried about what could happen in the future,” Wen said. “What if there’s a new variant that evades existing immunity? What if our hospitals get threatened at the point of being strained again? I want the CDC to have the authority at that point to say that masks have to come back.”
Wen said people worried about the disease or at risk of serious Covid-19 infection should still wear masks.
Letting it go. Neither Mizelle nor her past is the real government conundrum here. The White House could have immediately fought this in court, but as it weighed options Tuesday, masks were optional on many US planes. Congress could change the law, but not much can get through the US Senate.
There was not immediately any effort to lead in either of those directions.
In other words, the Democrats who are running the government are allowing this to happen, either because they think the science makes sense or because they lack the political will to change things.
Mask confusion….
Read More:Analysis: Biden’s White House lets Trump’s judge set mask policy for travelers